<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: JavaScript in Google Chrome Not So That Fast</title> <atom:link href="http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/</link> <description>JavaScript Techniques, Tricks and News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: chrome plugins</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-2/#comment-182</link> <dc:creator>chrome plugins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:11:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-182</guid> <description>Hands down, Google Chrome wins by a mile. It brings a huge speed improvement with a slick layout. And now with the developer version you can use extensions, simply Perfect!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hands down, Google Chrome wins by a mile. It brings a huge speed improvement with a slick layout. And now with the developer version you can use extensions, simply Perfect!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Chrome - Công Nghệ và Hạn Chế&#160;&#124;&#160;Sinh Viên FAT2 - wWw.FAT2.BIZ</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-2/#comment-95</link> <dc:creator>Google Chrome - Công Nghệ và Hạn Chế&#160;&#124;&#160;Sinh Viên FAT2 - wWw.FAT2.BIZ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:40:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-95</guid> <description>[...] lập đều cho thấy V8 vượt trội trong các tác vụ thuần JavaScript (mặc dù các thử nghiệm về tìm kiếm DOM không cho kết quả khả quan như mong đợi). Hiện thời có lẽ chỉ có TraceMonkey, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lập đều cho thấy V8 vượt trội trong các tác vụ thuần JavaScript (mặc dù các thử nghiệm về tìm kiếm DOM không cho kết quả khả quan như mong đợi). Hiện thời có lẽ chỉ có TraceMonkey, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TeacherDon</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-2/#comment-49</link> <dc:creator>TeacherDon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:14:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-49</guid> <description>According to your assertions, V8 JavaScript isn&#039;t as fast as touted, but your benchmarks are not testing the JavaScript engine, but the DOM engine.Testing the V8 JavaScript engine only gave me results about 8 times faster than FireFox and about 63 times faster than MSIE 7. As it turns out, the V8 isn&#039;t a JavaScript interpreter, but compiles JS directly into machine code. Since they have intentionally not optimized their engine yet, it will be interesting to see what the open source community will accomplish in the next few months.There is a unique case where V8 fails to shine and that is when the JavaScript runs functions only once or uses huge amounts of eval code, in which case the speed is about the same as both FireFox and MSIE.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to your assertions, V8 JavaScript isn&#8217;t as fast as touted, but your benchmarks are not testing the JavaScript engine, but the DOM engine.</p><p>Testing the V8 JavaScript engine only gave me results about 8 times faster than FireFox and about 63 times faster than MSIE 7. As it turns out, the V8 isn&#8217;t a JavaScript interpreter, but compiles JS directly into machine code. Since they have intentionally not optimized their engine yet, it will be interesting to see what the open source community will accomplish in the next few months.</p><p>There is a unique case where V8 fails to shine and that is when the JavaScript runs functions only once or uses huge amounts of eval code, in which case the speed is about the same as both FireFox and MSIE.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christian</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link> <dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:28:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-40</guid> <description>Could you add a current Safari / Webkit-Nightly in your comparison?Cause it doesn&#039;t make much sense to compare beta browsers like Chrome or IE8 with shipinng browsers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you add a current Safari / Webkit-Nightly in your comparison?</p><p>Cause it doesn&#8217;t make much sense to compare beta browsers like Chrome or IE8 with shipinng browsers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maurice</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link> <dc:creator>Maurice</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:05:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-31</guid> <description>We have performed some measurements on the performance of http://www.taskwriter.com . The results show Firefox 3.0 and Chrome being pretty close. By no means as far as Google suggests with its tests.Full details and graph here : http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is/btw, http://www.taskwriter.com is written using google web toolkit...so advantage for Chrome here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have performed some measurements on the performance of <a href="http://www.taskwriter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.taskwriter.com</a> . The results show Firefox 3.0 and Chrome being pretty close. By no means as far as Google suggests with its tests.</p><p>Full details and graph here : <a href="http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is/" rel="nofollow">http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is/</a></p><p>btw, <a href="http://www.taskwriter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.taskwriter.com</a> is written using google web toolkit&#8230;so advantage for Chrome here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: George Toms</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link> <dc:creator>George Toms</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:19:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-14</guid> <description>Google Chrome is really fast!Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is really fast!</p><p>Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):</p><p><a href="http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sonny</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link> <dc:creator>Sonny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:55:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-13</guid> <description>Hey Google fanboys, I&#039;m tired of browser war -- now come another browser to test for my web apps.OK, Chrome is fast, so what? It&#039;s new, no burden with many historical codes, not have many plugins yet. I&#039;ll see how fast it is in 2 years later.@fimbas: DOM selector is an important test; user may not care about it but web developer cannot ignore it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Google fanboys, I&#8217;m tired of browser war &#8212; now come another browser to test for my web apps.</p><p>OK, Chrome is fast, so what? It&#8217;s new, no burden with many historical codes, not have many plugins yet. I&#8217;ll see how fast it is in 2 years later.</p><p>@fimbas: DOM selector is an important test; user may not care about it but web developer cannot ignore it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chase Saunders</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link> <dc:creator>Chase Saunders</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:28:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-12</guid> <description>Why test these latest versions against a version of IE that came out 7 years ago?  Seems very odd.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why test these latest versions against a version of IE that came out 7 years ago?  Seems very odd.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fimbas</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link> <dc:creator>fimbas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:18:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-11</guid> <description>Most of the users does not cares and know about these test, their simple concern is that the page should open faster, and chrome is capable of loading pages faster than any other browser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the users does not cares and know about these test, their simple concern is that the page should open faster, and chrome is capable of loading pages faster than any other browser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maluku</title><link>http://javascriptly.com/2008/09/javascript-in-google-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link> <dc:creator>Maluku</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:48:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://javascriptly.com/?p=19#comment-10</guid> <description>Interestingly, on my own AJAX and Sofu based Website, Chrome is really 3 times faster, even though I didn&#039;t optimize it towards it. Chrome even provides the same smooth moves and picture quality from Safari, which Firefox still lacks. (Transparent Gifs over other pictures following the mouse (i.e window drag) distort the underlying image a lot)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, on my own AJAX and Sofu based Website, Chrome is really 3 times faster, even though I didn&#8217;t optimize it towards it. Chrome even provides the same smooth moves and picture quality from Safari, which Firefox still lacks. (Transparent Gifs over other pictures following the mouse (i.e window drag) distort the underlying image a lot)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/16 queries in 0.091 seconds using disk

Served from: quangvhg.virtual.vps-host.net @ 2010-03-18 05:12:35 -->